Sport Forum NET

Full Version: 2008-2009 Schedule
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3
ok
ArrayNO SUSPENSIONS!!![/quote]
Why not?
It's stuns me the number of sub .500 predictions. No one in our division is getting noticeably stronger. We had a horrible injury plagued season with a QB carousel and no running game and still manged to finish 7-9. losing several very close games.. so I don't see why 9-7 is such a stretch for people...
Because we lost our top 2 WR, we replaced them with one washed-up WR, and are relaying on an injury plagued WR to be the #2. I will re-think my picks after the draft, but for now, 4-12 is what it is
ArrayIt's stuns me the number of sub .500 predictions. No one in our division is getting noticeably stronger. We had a horrible injury plagued season with a QB carousel and no running game and still manged to finish 7-9. losing several very close games.. so I don't see why 9-7 is such a stretch for people...[/quote]

There is only 1 way I see the Bears winning 9 games:

The NFL making a rule that Devin Hester must touch the ball on every kickoff or punt. Unless Hester touches the ball 7-10 times a game, the Bears current roster will not be able to score enough points to win more than 5-6 games IMO.

Should be noted that my opinion is based on watching 2-3 Bears games a year. So take it for what it's worth.
ArrayIt's stuns me the number of sub .500 predictions. No one in our division is getting noticeably stronger. We had a horrible injury plagued season with a QB carousel and no running game and still manged to finish 7-9. losing several very close games.. so I don't see why 9-7 is such a stretch for people...[/quote]

Including ourselves. We had a horrible season with injuries that look to continue, a QB carousel with no one to stop it, and a <span style="color:green"> greatly improved running game. I don't see why a losing season is such a stretch for people....
Pages: 1 2 3